Skip to main content

From the Molly Maguires to the United Mine Workers: The Social Ecology of an Industrial Union 1869–1897: Part V: The Collective Response: The Physical Plant

From the Molly Maguires to the United Mine Workers: The Social Ecology of an Industrial Union 1869–1897
Part V: The Collective Response: The Physical Plant
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeFrom the Molly Maguires to the United Mine Workers
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Cover
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright
  4. Foreword: Walter Licht
  5. Contents
  6. Introduction
  7. Part I: The Environmental Setting
    1. 1. The Physical Surroundings
    2. 2. The Industry
    3. 3. The Community
  8. Part II: Work
    1. 4. The Productive System
    2. 5. The Reward System
  9. Part III: The Individual Response
    1. 6. Mobility
  10. Part IV: The Collective Response: The Reward System
    1. 7. The First Union
    2. 8. The Collapse of the W.B.A.
    3. 9. A Violent Interlude
    4. 10. Reorganization and Collapse
    5. 11. Final Organization
  11. Part V: The Collective Response: The Physical Plant
    1. 12. Mine Safety
    2. 13. Welfare
    3. 14. An Overview
  12. Notes
  13. Appendix I. Production and Employment in the Anthracite Industry
  14. Appendix II. Rules Adopted by the Coal Operators and Mine Superintendents of the Eastern District of the Wyoming and Lackawanna Coal Fields, at the Mine Inspector's Office, Scranton, Pennsylvania, December 24, 1881
  15. Appendix III. Contract Between a Miner and a Store
  16. Appendix IV. Rules to Govern the Mining of Coal in Pittston and Vicinity as Adopted by the Operators and Miners This 12th Day of August, 1863
  17. Bibliography
  18. Index

Part V

The Collective Response: The Physical Plant

The anthracite industry’s physical plant produced two major problems for the mine workers. First, it was necessary to reduce the high accident rate of the mines by upgrading safety standards. Since the high cost of improving the safety of a particular mine would be damaging to the competitive position of the operator, management would never acquiesce to such a proposal unless assured that all operators would simultaneously comply. Faced with the need for inclusive and simultaneous compliance, the mine workers turned to the state, which alone possessed enough coercive power to compel universal acceptance of safety standards.

Second, because of the simple fact that even with the cooperation of the state the mines could never be accident-free, the mine workers needed welfare provisions for the victim and his family. A variety of techniques could be used to solve this problem. The state could be asked to provide a welfare program. The mine workers could help their unfortunate colleagues. And management could help its distressed employees, although operators were not likely to establish welfare programs unless they were forced to.

Each of the several techniques for solving the problems projected by the productive system’s physical plant presupposed collective activity. Low wages precluded individual savings and made the group the mainspring of self-help. Most important, although the mine workers possessed numbers, the raw material of political power, this resource became meaningful only when organized and directed.

Annotate

Next Chapter
12. Mine Safety
PreviousNext
All rights reserved
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org