Skip to main content

From the Molly Maguires to the United Mine Workers: The Social Ecology of an Industrial Union 1869–1897: Part III: The Individual Response

From the Molly Maguires to the United Mine Workers: The Social Ecology of an Industrial Union 1869–1897
Part III: The Individual Response
    • Notifications
    • Privacy
  • Project HomeFrom the Molly Maguires to the United Mine Workers
  • Projects
  • Learn more about Manifold

Notes

Show the following:

  • Annotations
  • Resources
Search within:

Adjust appearance:

  • font
    Font style
  • color scheme
  • Margins
table of contents
  1. Cover
  2. Title Page
  3. Copyright
  4. Foreword: Walter Licht
  5. Contents
  6. Introduction
  7. Part I: The Environmental Setting
    1. 1. The Physical Surroundings
    2. 2. The Industry
    3. 3. The Community
  8. Part II: Work
    1. 4. The Productive System
    2. 5. The Reward System
  9. Part III: The Individual Response
    1. 6. Mobility
  10. Part IV: The Collective Response: The Reward System
    1. 7. The First Union
    2. 8. The Collapse of the W.B.A.
    3. 9. A Violent Interlude
    4. 10. Reorganization and Collapse
    5. 11. Final Organization
  11. Part V: The Collective Response: The Physical Plant
    1. 12. Mine Safety
    2. 13. Welfare
    3. 14. An Overview
  12. Notes
  13. Appendix I. Production and Employment in the Anthracite Industry
  14. Appendix II. Rules Adopted by the Coal Operators and Mine Superintendents of the Eastern District of the Wyoming and Lackawanna Coal Fields, at the Mine Inspector's Office, Scranton, Pennsylvania, December 24, 1881
  15. Appendix III. Contract Between a Miner and a Store
  16. Appendix IV. Rules to Govern the Mining of Coal in Pittston and Vicinity as Adopted by the Operators and Miners This 12th Day of August, 1863
  17. Bibliography
  18. Index

Part III

The Individual Response

Improving his working conditions and bringing about a more equitable reward system were the anthracite mine worker’s two major problems. Since mine operators would resist attempts to do anything about either problem, the solution depended on power.

The individual mine worker, of course, had little power, partly because the anthracite miners functioned in task groups. Stripped of power and even individual identity by the collective productive system, the mine worker could solve his major problems on an individual basis only by escaping from the mine. Effective action within the industry could be undertaken only by the group.

Annotate

Next Chapter
6. Mobility
PreviousNext
All rights reserved
Powered by Manifold Scholarship. Learn more at
Opens in new tab or windowmanifoldapp.org